A Review Of case law on mortgage slideshare
A Review Of case law on mortgage slideshare
Blog Article
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy of your information contained on this site, or even the information linked to on the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can make inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Small fees use.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI 46 SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have heard the realized counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as the issues on the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(1) in the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession of your subjected premises into the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to get decided via the competent court after hearing the parties if pending given that the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer while in the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court needs to see this component for interim custody of the subject premises When the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to around the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can create inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
Unfortunately, that was not correct. Just two months after being placed with the Roe family, the Roe’s son informed his parents that the boy had molested him. The boy was arrested two times later, and admitted to possessing sexually molested the pair’s son several times.
In order to preserve a uniform enforcement in the laws, the legal system adheres into the doctrine of stare decisis
In the United States, courts exist on both the federal and state levels. The United States Supreme Court would be the highest court while in the United States. Lower courts to the federal level include things like the U.S. Courts of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Claims, and also the U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Bankruptcy Courts. Federal courts listen to cases involving matters related into the United States Constitution, other federal laws and regulations, and certain matters that contain parties from different states or countries and large sums of money in dispute. Just about every state has its own judicial system that contains trial and appellate courts. The highest court in Every single state is frequently referred to as being the “supreme” court, Though there are some exceptions to this rule, for example, the The big apple Court of Appeals or perhaps the Maryland Court of Appeals. State courts generally listen to cases involving state constitutional matters, state regulation and regulations, Even though state courts might also generally listen to cases involving federal laws.
We are an independent branch of government constitutionally entrusted with the fair and just resolution of disputes in order to preserve the rule of legislation and to protect the rights and liberties guaranteed because of the Constitution and laws with the United States and this State.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming on the main case, Additionally it is a effectively-recognized proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of click here misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is matter on the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.
This Court may perhaps interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside of a manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding attained by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In the event the conclusion or finding is such as no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court might interfere with the conclusion or the finding and mould the relief to really make it ideal to your facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority could be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-take pleasure in the evidence or the nature of punishment. Over the aforesaid proposition, we've been fortified because of the decision with the Supreme Court from the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance of your respondents that pensionary benefits could be withheld on account of your allegations leveled against the petitioner, inside our view, section twenty of the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does provide for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension could be withheld or reduced. These consist of if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension can be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. In certain cases, a civil servant's pension may be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established through the government.
The appellate court determined that the trial court had not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to generally be gathered by the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
171 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be perfectly established now that the provision for proforma promotion just isn't alien or unfamiliar on the civil servant service composition but it's already embedded in Fundamental Rule seventeen, wherein it truly is lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority may well if content that a civil servant who was entitled being promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his possess, wrongfully prevented from rendering service on the Federation/ province from the higher post, direct that this sort of civil servant shall be paid the arrears of pay out and allowances of these kinds of higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main case, It is usually a well-set up proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is matter to your procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to reach at its independent findings within the evidence.